{"id":885,"date":"2015-03-05T17:50:30","date_gmt":"2015-03-05T21:50:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jparnell.com\/blog\/?p=885"},"modified":"2015-03-05T17:50:30","modified_gmt":"2015-03-05T21:50:30","slug":"political-correctness-at-the-u-of-minnesota","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/?p=885","title":{"rendered":"Political Correctness at the U of Minnesota"},"content":{"rendered":"

I was intrigued to learn that the University of Minnesota recently decided to no longer include racial descriptions in crime alerts to avoid stigmatizing minorities. By definition, crime alerts are designed to provide specific information about a perpetrator so that the general public\u2014in this instance, faculty, staff and students\u2014can remain vigilant and safe. The purpose and effectiveness of crime alerts is directly tied to the specificity of the information. It wouldn\u2019t do me much good to know that robbery suspects on my campus are on the loose if I don\u2019t know what they look like.<\/p>\n

There are two problems here. First, why not eliminate other descriptors as well? For example, most assailants are young males, so identifying a perpetrator as such reinforces the stereotype that young males are criminals. If we are really concerns with social stigmas, then we must take this argument to its logical conclusion. Needless to say, a crime alert that avoids race, gender, and age would be essentially useless, as in the hypothetical alert, \u201cWe have information that a heavily armed person with a red shirt is loose on campus.\u201d I hope I don\u2019t happen to be out for a jog and wearing a red shirt when that alert goes out.<\/p>\n

The second problem is ironic; not including specific information in a crime alert can cause members of the general public to fill in the blanks themselves. Although removing this information from the alert is designed to trigger fewer racial or ethnic stereotypes, those prone to them might mistakenly conclude that a nondescript perpetrator identified in an alert is a young, non-white male. Hence, withholding information can actually lead to stigmatization.<\/p>\n

In researching the University of Minnesota\u2019s decision, I ran across a column by Camille Galles at the Minnesota Daily<\/em> (www.mndaily.com\/opinion\/columns\/2015\/02\/02\/political-correctness-connects-people<\/a>). Galles presents the logic that underpins PC thinking, arguing that, \u201cfor students, being politically correct helps facilitate open dialogue instead of stifling it.\u201d Put another way, political correctness is not offensive and makes everyone feel safe, thereby promoting deeper conversations among parties with different worldviews.<\/p>\n

There is a kernel of truth here. Avoiding offending someone\u2014when possible<\/em>\u2014helps advance an argument and promotes greater understanding. The problem is that real issues involve inconvenient reality. When truth is evaded in the interest of political correctness, then an entire conversation is based on half-truths and is therefore, worthless at best. At worst, such conversations can be damaging because they create the illusion of sound conclusions.<\/p>\n

Consider the following example. Common sense tells us that some<\/span> Americans who receive unemployment benefits don\u2019t really want a job. This is not to say that all or even most unemployed Americans are in this category; the percentage is up for debate, but at least some<\/span> are. If making this point is not permitted (i.e., politically incorrect) because it might offend unemployed Americans who are genuinely seeking work, then the discussion must proceed on the misguided idea that all<\/span> Americans who receive unemployment benefits really want to work instead of receiving government benefits. Hence, Galles has it completely wrong. As this example illustrates, political correctness stifles open dialogue and can actually lead to poor personal decisions and poor public policy.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m a strong advocate for free speech everywhere, especially college campuses. It\u2019s important to encourage everyone to be respectful when expressing views. However, real tolerance is the opposite of political correctness. It\u2019s about being offended less and respecting differences, not evading them.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I was intrigued to learn that the University of Minnesota recently decided to no longer include racial descriptions in crime alerts to avoid stigmatizing minorities. By definition, crime alerts are designed to provide specific information about a perpetrator so that the general public\u2014in this instance, faculty, staff and students\u2014can remain vigilant and safe. The purpose […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/885"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=885"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/885\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=885"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=885"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=885"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}