Polls get far too much attention in the press, especially several months before an election. Nonetheless, the misnomers about the polling process never cease to amaze me. I\u2019ve addressed polling in the past, but I\u2019m going to update my comments in this post.<\/p>\n
Who you ask, what you ask, how you ask, and how you tabulate the results are critical. Polling is a science, but it\u2019s also a social science<\/em>. Instead of measuring chemical reactions in a lab, you are measuring attitudes. People are much more complicated than chemicals, they don\u2019t always tell the truth, and election polls must factor in one\u2019s likelihood to vote. For these reasons, even the best professional pollsters get different answers when they are polling on the same issue.<\/p>\n Of course, another reason poll results can vary widely is that some pollsters are biased and seek certain results as a means of influencing behavior. If polls show that most Americans support candidate A, then some supporters of candidate B might give up or blame the candidate, and undecided voters\u2014wanting to get behind a winner\u2014might tend to support candidate A as well. I think the actual behavior of most voters is not affected by polls, but this isn\u2019t the point. Even if poll results only influence the activity of 2-3% of voters, they can easily swing an election.<\/em><\/p>\n Leading questions and poor wording are common problems. Consider the question, \u201cDo you think Hillary Clinton should be held accountable for using a private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State? Even if respondents share a common understanding of the scandal, \u201cheld accountable\u201d might mean a reprimand to some and jail time to others. The results from questions such as these are simply not valid.<\/p>\n Even when questions are clear and worded correctly, some errors are difficult to overcome. Election pollsters try to survey a small group of voters that precisely represents the population of actual voters. A common misconception is that you cannot produce a reliable poll with only several hundred respondents. Statistically, you can. The real problem is how<\/em> you select the respondents. Phone polls are common, but they not include lots of voters who don\u2019t have landlines, don\u2019t answer calls from unknown callers, or do not respond in a truthful manner. \u00a0Pollsters try to account for this problem by adjusting results, but they are really guessing.<\/p>\n Some errors are difficult to calculate from the outset. For example, should polls include candidates other than Clinton and Trump? The knee-jerk answer is yes because they will be on the ballot, but history\u2014which can be wrong\u2014tells us that most<\/em> third party supporters end up voting for one of the two major candidates. Gary Johnson might poll at 10% in some states, but how many of his supporters will switch to Clinton or Trump in November? Nobody really knows. This issue alone is enough to weaken the results.<\/p>\n If you really like to follow polls, I suggest tracking averages at Real Clear Politics<\/em>. By incorporating lots of polls into a composite, they probably average out some of the error on both sides. This is still just a best guess, but it\u2019s better than relying on a single poll. At the end of the day, however, I suggest that you treat all polls with serious caution. They can and will be deceiving.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Polls get far too much attention in the press, especially several months before an election. Nonetheless, the misnomers about the polling process never cease to amaze me. I\u2019ve addressed polling in the past, but I\u2019m going to update my comments in this post. Who you ask, what you ask, how you ask, and how you […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1039"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1039"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1039\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1039"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1039"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1039"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}