{"id":1020,"date":"2016-07-13T16:23:41","date_gmt":"2016-07-13T20:23:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jparnell.com\/blog\/?p=1020"},"modified":"2016-07-13T16:23:41","modified_gmt":"2016-07-13T20:23:41","slug":"manipulating-the-currency","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/?p=1020","title":{"rendered":"Manipulating the Currency"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Recently I\u2019ve been asked if and how I can support Donald Trump when he appears to be opposed to free trade. My last post introduced some of the most important facets of free\/fair trade. I will expand on one of them\u2014currency manipulation\u2014in this post.<\/p>\n<p>Ten years ago, the exchange rate between the US dollar and the Chinese yuan (also called RMB) was about 8 RMB per dollar (see <a href=\"http:\/\/www.xe.com\/currencycharts\/?from=USD&amp;to=CNY&amp;view=10Y)\">http:\/\/www.xe.com\/currencycharts\/?from=USD&amp;to=CNY&amp;view=10Y)<\/a>. Today, the rate is about 6.7 RMB per dollar. All other factors held constant, a product made in China and worth 800 RMB would have sold for $100 ten years ago, but would now sell for $119\u2014a 19% increase\u2014due to the strengthening of the yuan relative to the dollar.<\/p>\n<p>From the Chinese perspective, this means that a $100 product sold in China would have cost about 800 RMB ten years ago, but would only cost 670 RMB today. In other words, the dollar as weakened relative to the RMB, resulting in an overall price reduction of 16%.<\/p>\n<p>A weaker dollar is good for US companies but bad for US consumers. US producers will be able to sell products in China at lower prices in terms of <em>their<\/em> currency, while US consumers will have to pay more for Chinese products. Conversely, a stronger dollar is bad for US companies but good for US consumers, because it raises the price of American products abroad and reduces the price of Chinese products in the US.<\/p>\n<p>So what is the problem with the Chinese currency? Exchange rates among major world currencies fluctuate naturally with their economies. However, the Chinese government <em>pegs<\/em> the value of the RMB to the US dollar, allowing only minor fluctuations <em>except<\/em> when central planners decide to make or allow more significant changes. In other words, the Chinese government can adjust the relative prices of its products in US markets by maintaining an <em>artificial<\/em> exchange rate. Historically, the Chinese have undercut US firms by keeping the RMB <em>artificially weak<\/em>. They sought to strengthen the RMB as Chinese industries strengthen and their companies are able to command higher prices abroad.<\/p>\n<p>Chinese leaders claim that this controlled exchange is only temporary while Chinese firms \u201ccatch up\u201d with more established global competitors. Moreover, some economists contend that maintaining a weak RMB isn\u2019t really a problem for the US because it allows Americans to purchase products at lower prices. While this is true, it puts our companies at a competitive disadvantage and also creates long-term problems as some industries (electronics, for example) become dominated by Chinese manufacturers. Given that many Chinese manufacturers are government-subsidized and Chinese central planners can manipulate the currency at any time, their firms will maintain a decided global advantage.<\/p>\n<p>Some economists claim that a free floating exchange rate\u2014if permitted by Chinese authorities\u2014would be about the same as the current controlled rate anyway. If this were true, then the Chinese would have already stopped pegging the RMB exchange rate to the dollar. It\u2019s difficult to calculate what the free floating exchange rate would be between the dollar and the RMB, but I\u2019m convinced the RMB would be stronger (less than the current 6.7 per dollar), which would be a boon for American firms.<\/p>\n<p>US leaders have given lip service to this issue in the past, but all of them have been afraid to seriously confront the Chinese. Perhaps they fear a \u201ctrade war\u201d if we push too hard. Nonetheless, Trump is right to argue that this is an issue that must be negotiated. To be free <em>and<\/em> fair, governments should not interfere in currency exchange markets. The prosperity of US firms lies in the balance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Recently I\u2019ve been asked if and how I can support Donald Trump when he appears to be opposed to free trade. My last post introduced some of the most important facets of free\/fair trade. I will expand on one of them\u2014currency manipulation\u2014in this post. Ten years ago, the exchange rate between the US dollar and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1020"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1020"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1020\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1020"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1020"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/battle4liberty.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1020"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}